exit planning tools
GAAP traps often occur when a business owner sells a company to a third party. The transaction is commonly memorialized by a Purchase Agreement. That agreement contains certain representations (or “reps”) and warranties. Some of these are common sense and should pose no problem to someone who has operated a good business. The Accounts Receivable represent money that is actually owed to the company. Taxes have been filed on a timely basis. The seller doesn’t know of any pending litigation. The owner has the right and authority to enter into a sale agreement. There is one, however, that is frequently required by attorneys who don’t understand privately held business, and agreed to by owners and their attorneys who don’t understand what they are guaranteeing. They are Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP. What is GAAP? To start, the term “Generally Accepted” is misleading. It could easily be interpreted as “what everyone typically does.” Nothing could be further from the truth. GAAP is determined by two organizations, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Per I
Jul 31, 2024
Jul 31, 2024
1 min read
When it comes to careers, business owners are a minority of the population. In conversations this week, I mentioned the statistics several times, and each owner I was discussing it with was surprised that they had so few peers. According to the Small Business Administration (SBA), there are over 33,000,000 businesses in the US. Let’s discount those with zero employees. Many are shell companies or real estate holding entities. Also, those with fewer than 5 employees, true “Mom and Pop” businesses, are hard to distinguish from a job. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Association, lists businesses with 5 to 99 employees at about 3,300,000, and 123,000 have 100 to 500 employees (the SBA’s largest “small business” classification.) Overall, that means about 1% of the country are private employers. Owners are a small minority, a very small minority, of the population. Even if we only count working adults (161,000,000) business owners represent only a little more than 2% of that population. So What? Where am I going with this, and how does it relate to our recent discussions of purpose in business exit planning? It’s an important issue to consider when discussing an owner’s identity after transition. Whether or not individual owners know the statistics of their “rare species” status in society, they instinctively understand that they are different. They are identified with their owner status in every aspect of their business and personal life. At a social event, when asked “What do you do?” they will often respond “I own a business.” It’s an immediate differentiator from describing a job. “I am a carpenter.” or “I work in systems engineering,” describes a function. “I am a business owner” describes a life role. When asked for further information, the owner frequently replies in the Imperial first person plural. “We build multi-family housing,” is never mistaken for a personal role in the company. No one takes that answer to mean that the speaker swings a hammer all day. Owners are a Minority We process much of our information subconsciously. If a man enters a business gathering, for example, and the others in the room are 75% female, he will know instinctively, without consciously counting, that this business meeting or organization is different from others he attends. Similarly, business owners accept their minority status without thinking about it. They expect that the vast majority of the people they meet socially, who attend their church, or who have kids that play sports with theirs, work for someone else. There are places where owners congregate, but otherwise, they don’t expect to meet many other owners in the normal course of daily activity. This can be an issue after they exit the business. You see, telling people “I’m retired” has no distinction. Roughly 98% of the other people who say that never built an organization. They didn’t take the same risks. Others didn’t deal with the same broad variety of issues and challenges. Most didn’t have to personally live with the impact of every daily decision they made, or watch others suffer the consequences of their bad calls. That is why so many former owners suffer from a lack of identity after they leave. Subconsciously, they expect to stand out from the other 98%. “I’m retired” carries no such distinction. This article was originally published by John F. Dini, CBEC, CExP, CEPA on
The Value Gap is one of the most used phrases in exit planning. Simply stated, it’s the difference between what a business owner would realize if he or she sold the company today, and what they need to embark on a financially secure “next act” after business ownership. Both amounts can be determined with some accuracy by professionals. A qualified appraiser will analyze a company, its prospects, differentiation, markets, and comparative businesses and develop a value for the business. A good financial planner will look at savings, expected income, anticipated lifestyle expenses, life expectancy, and inflation and develop a scenario for the amount needed to fund those expectations. Simple, right? Financial plan requirements minus net proceeds from the business transfer equals the value gap. Testing the Value Gap If it is so simple, why do so few business owners do it? Instead, they value their businesses by hearsay, misestimate their lifestyle needs by a substantial margin, and think “I’ll probably be fine.” In fact, fewer than one owner in five has even documented any plan for their transition. Let’s take my favorite business owner, Bob of Bob’s Widgets Inc. Bob pays himself $120,000 a year and lives nicely on that amount. So he estimates that $10,000 a month should cover his lifestyle in retirement. To generate that, he needs $3,000,000 in savings with a 4% return. That means he has to sell his business for about $4,000,000, assuming 24% capital gains tax. His company sold $7,000,000 in widgets last year, with a $500,000 pre-tax bottom line, so he is sure it’s worth at least $4,000,000. (We’ll discuss this valuation in my next column.) But wait a minute. Is Bob really making $120,000 a year? He drives a Ford Super-Duty company truck that cost $85,000. The payment is about $1,500 a month. Insurance, maintenance and fuel are paid for by the company. Bob’s Widgets Inc. also pays for Bob’s $750 a month health insurance, his $1,200 monthly life insurance, and his $7,200 annual personal tax preparation bill. “Sellers Discretionary Expenses” Bob’s company expenses are not only common, but he doesn’t really take all that much in comparison to some owners. Any advisor can tell stories of company-paid second homes, family trips and other expenses far less business-related than Bob’s. Without going beyond what would be considered “normal” owner perks, we can add about $58,000 a year in post-tax spending to Bob’s lifestyle. At his 4% return assumption, that adds another $1,450,000 in post-tax proceeds from the business to his need for a liquid asset base. Even if Bob’s assumption of a lower capital gains rate is correct (which is not the case in 90% of small business sales) he actually needs a sale price of at least $6,000,000 just to maintain his current lifestyle. Even Bob knows that his company can’t sell for $6,000,000. Without getting an appraisal or a formal financial plan, Bob has just had his first lesson in planning for the Value Gap. This article was originally published by John F. Dini, CBEC, CExP, CEPA on
Purpose after the sale is one of the biggest challenges for an exiting owner. Purpose – “Having as one’s intention or objective.” Many exit planning advisors discuss the three legs of the exit planning stool – business readiness, financial readiness and personal readiness. In our previous two articles, we focused on two of the “big three” components of a successful life after the sale, activity and identity. The third is purpose. So many advisors point to the 75% of former owners who “profoundly regret” their transition, and say it’s because they didn’t make enough money. To quote Mr. Bernstein in the great film Citizen Kane, “Well, it’s no trick to make a lot of money…if all you want is to make a lot of money.” I’ve interviewed hundreds of business founders. When asked why they started their companies, by far the most common answers are about providing for their families and having control of their future. Only a very small percentage say “I wanted to make a lot of money.” Decades of Purpose So what kept them working long hours and pushing the envelope after they had reached primary, secondary and even tertiary financial goals? Non-owners often chalk it up to greed, but Maslov’s hierarchy of needs drifts away from material rewards after the first two levels. Belonging, Self-Esteem and Self-Actualization may all have a financial component, but money isn’t the driver. For most owners, the driving motivation is this thing they’ve built. The company has a life of its own, but it’s a life they bestowed. They talk about the business’s growing pains and maturity. Owners are acutely aware of the multiplier effect the success of the company has on employees and their families. In a few cases, that multiplier extends to entire towns. That’s the purpose. To nurture and expand. In so many cases every process in the business was the founder’s creation. He or she picked out the furniture and designed the first logo. This aggregation of people breathes and succeeds on what the owner built. That’s why so many owners still put in 50 or more hours a week, long after there is any real need for their constant presence. This thing they created is their purpose. Purpose After the Sale It’s no surprise that so many owners find that 36 holes of golf each week, or 54, or 72, still isn’t enough to feel fulfilled. You can get incrementally better, but it doesn’t really affect anyone but you. Building a beautiful table or catching a trophy fish brings pride and some sense of accomplishment. Still, it never matches the feeling of creating something that impacts dozens, scores or hundreds of other human beings. That’s why we focus on purpose as the third leg of the personal vision. In the vast majority of cases, it involves impacting other people. Any owner spent a career learning how to teach and lead. Keeping those skills fresh and growing is a substantial part of the road to satisfaction. Purpose may involve church or a community service organization. It could be serving on a Board of Directors or consulting for other business owners. It might be writing or speaking. Purpose after the sale doesn’t require a 50-hour week, but it does require some level of commitment, and the ability to affect the lives of others. This article was originally published by John F. Dini, CBEC, CExP, CEPA on
Life after the sale is often both the most important and most neglected factor in exit planning. Although (according to two different surveys in 2013 and 2022,) 75% of owners report regrets or unhappiness a year after the transition, exit plans continue to be constructed primarily around financial targets. In the event you haven’t heard this since you were five years old, “Money doesn’t fix everything.” Superficial Planning To be fair, most advisors include some conversation about “life after” in their planning conversations. Unfortunately, they are often satisfied with the features associated with an abundance of free time. Visiting the family, RV’ing through the country, playing 72 holes of golf a week, or seeing the great capitals of Europe can all be accomplished in the first year after ownership. When they attempt to broach the idea of longer-term activity, the client’s answer is often “Let’s get the money. Then I’ll worry about what to do with it.” It’s challenging to push beyond the client’s desire to focus on the most obvious goal, especially when it seems to enable everything that follows. Nonetheless, owners who are unhappy because they didn’t get enough money failed either to understand the realities of their transactions or the future cost of their life plans. That certainly isn’t 75% of planning clients. We are discussing the far greater number who have sufficient funds, but after their initial splurge of free time are unsure of what to do next. Emotional Preparation The first issue an exited owner faces is identity. “I used to own a company” quickly wears thin, and increasingly fades as years pass. “I’m retired” is a nebulous identity, and lumps them into a group with every wage earner who says the same. That’s a class they’ve proudly differentiated from for most of their lives. Some mental health professionals have compared the emotional reaction to missing ownership identity to post-partum depression. Their world has changed overnight. The principal subject of their interest is gone, and they aren’t sure what replaces it. Post-partum is characterized as including “a feeling of guilt, worthlessness, hopelessness or helplessness.” As an owner, there was always something else that needed their attention. Now there isn’t. Distress from discussing the daily news (which they now watch more frequently) used to be countered by a requirement to attend to the business. Now there is no business to attend to. The feeling of “What I do is important to a lot of people” has gone. Identity in Life After the Sale We encourage clients to at least mentally design their next business card. Handing someone your card is a shorthand version of declaring your identity. The first attempt by many is jocular but meaningless. “Part-time Philanthropist, Bon Vivant and Man About Town” is funny, but only once. “Grandparent, Outdoorsman and Classic Car Mechanic” is better. At least it describes real activities for further conversation. “Business Counselor and Chairman of the Board of (Charity Name)” describes an identity, ongoing contribution to something or someone, and a role of importance. It doesn’t have to be true today (we aren’t printing the business cards yet,) but it’s at least aspirational. Building a plan for life after the sale begins with establishing a future identity. There are several other components that we will cover in the next two articles. This article was originally published by John F. Dini, CBEC, CExP, CEPA on
Lifestyle and Legacy are two very different types of owner transition objectives. When we ask a client “What do you expect as a result of our exit planning?” the answer may be about the money, the time frame, or the impact on people. No matter how it is phrased, the response will break down into one of two major categories. It’s either about the owner’s future lifestyle, or the legacy that is left behind. Lifestyle Objectives Many clients want to exit to an enjoyable retirement. Usually, their primary concern is financial security. They want enough money to live comfortably, and to take care of their family. This is the reason many start their process by consulting with a financial planner, but lifestyle objectives can extend well beyond their bank account. A separate but related objective is time. It may be the time to travel without being chained to a laptop. The time to explore new things outside the business might result in formal education or training. Undertaking a new wellness regimen requires time, as does exploring a new hobby. Time might be used to engage in community service. An issue that is increasing in the Baby Boomer generation is the time to care for older family members. Another lifestyle issue is the ability to relocate. Moving to a place for favored activities, a better climate or to be closer to children (and grandchildren) often requires separation from the activities of the business. Legacy Objectives Some owners run their businesses for other than purely financial reasons. In these cases, they may be more concerned with how the business continues than the proceeds to be realized from a sale. Of course, a chief motivation for putting legacy at the top of the list is family succession. It might be a sense of obligation in a company that has already passed through multiple generations, or just a desire to provide future generations with the benefits of ownership. The role of the business in the community is also a legacy concern. The company could be a key employer in a small town, or a primary sponsor of a school or Little League. The owner’s name on the door or the preservation of long-standing business relationships can often affect the desirability of a buyer in the seller’s eyes. Environment, Social, or Governance (ESG) concerns have become increasingly important to some sellers. They want to make certain that the importance they place on these issues is shared by future ownership. Finally, the future growth and success of the business can be considered a legacy issue. An owner could have concern for the opportunities such growth provides to loyal employees, or whether innovations and proprietary processes will be expanded beyond their current limits. Lifestyle and Legacy Every owner’s objectives will have some combination of lifestyle and legacy concerns. They don’t necessarily conflict, but they involve differing perspectives. This article was originally published by John F. Dini, CBEC, CExP, CEPA on
Since 2013 I’ve updated this piece about the underappreciated and forgotten boss of A Christmas Carol, Mr. Fezziwig. I hope that you enjoy it. Merry Christmas! Last week was the 180th anniversary of the publication of Charles Dickens’s A Christmas Carol (December 17, 1843). The immortal words of Ebenezer Scrooge are ingrained in the memory of the entire English-speaking world. I’d venture to guess that “Bah, Humbug!” can be correctly identified as to the source and speaker by over 99% of those reading this. The novella, serialized in five parts, was not a commercial success. Unhappy with the sales of his previous novel (Martin Chuzzlewit– no wonder!), he refused his normal fee from the publisher in favor of royalties on the proceeds, which proved disappointing. Critical reception was favorable, although it didn’t catch on in America until much later. The New York Times first published a review in 1863, 20 years after its publication in England. Like most of Dickens’ work, A Christmas Carol includes an indictment of the social inequalities of the Industrial Age; child labor, workhouses, and debtors’ prisons. It stands out, however, because of the lessons taught by its memorable ghosts, and the redemption of its main character in only 113 pages. During the Protestant Reformation in England and Scotland, Christmas had become a period of penance and reflection. A Christmas Carol is credited by many for leading the return to a celebratory holiday, focused on appreciation and thanks for family and friends. Modern Ebenezers Modern filmmakers have returned to the straight-ahead plot and uplifting storyline (not to mention the recurring royalties available year after year) with a frequency that helps stamp the legend in our psyche. Starting with the 1938 Reginald Owen version (originally released as “Scrooge”) and the 1951 Alistair Sim classic, the character of Ebenezer has been tackled by actors ranging from George C. Scott to Michael Caine (with the Muppets). Patrick Stewart, Kelsey Grammar, and Rich Little (in various celebrity impersonations) have taken a shot, as have Mickey Mouse, Mr. Magoo, the Smurfs, Barbie, Dora the Explorer, and the Flintstones. Let’s not forget the variants; Bill Murray in “Scrooged”, or Boris Karloff and Jim Carrey in their versions of “How the Grinch Stole Christmas.” In all, IMDB lists almost 200 filmed variants of the story. Unfortunately, the characterization of Scrooge has become ingrained in the minds of many as a stereotype of all bosses who dare to focus on margins and profit. How many employees identify their bosses with Fezziwig (Scrooge’s former employer,) who took pride in making his employees a happy group, even though Scrooge dismissed It as “only a little thing?” The Success of Mr. Fezziwig Instead of focusing on the things that allowed Fezziwig to spend lavishly on his employees (a motivated workforce, honesty, doing what’s right, profitability), we prefer to fantasize about a boss who expresses his sudden enlightenment by unexpectedly bestowing a dinner and an extra day off. Fezziwig is relegated to an afterthought, an overweight doting uncle with no visible reason for his success. Most of us are far more Fezziwigs than Scrooges. Oddly, if we celebrated the season of giving by presenting our employees with a list of all the “little things” we’ve done for them during the year, we’d be considered self-serving, and more akin to Ebenezer. We bow to the popular myth, give even more at the holidays, and hope it has some carryover of appreciation into the New Year. Just remember to remind your employees when you are being Mr. Fezziwig for the rest of the year. A Christmas turkey for Tiny Tim isn’t as important as being a good boss on the other 364 days. This article was originally published by John F. Dini, CBEC, CExP, CEPA on
Owner obstacles to the implementation of an exit plan are often unconscious, but they can be dramatic. Their attachment to the business can be difficult to break. An advisor spends a lot of time and energy developing the vision for life after ownership in the hopes that it is far more attractive to them than their current role in the business. Yet no matter how well developed that vision is, or how well defined the action steps are, it isn’t unusual to find owners who behave in a way that ultimately sabotages the plan. Sometimes their actions are even intentional, but more often they aren’t. The problems arise in two ways. “Death from Inattention” We always ask exit planning clients for two target dates. The first is when they want to be relieved of day-to-day operational responsibilities. The second is when they want to be completely free of any connection to the company. We tell a client that once we have achieved the first objective, the second may become more flexible. Freed of the task-based duties of running the business, an owner often becomes more strategic. He may start planning for new growth and value creation. She might go back to her role when the business first started, when she was the best salesperson or the designer of novel product offerings. Owners returning to their core skill set are usually a benefit to the business. The problem arises when they enjoy the lack of responsibility so much that they just become owners in absentia. There is no strategy. The company drifts along on the backs of the operations managers, but really doesn’t have a direction beyond “more of what we did yesterday.” There are no new initiatives. Companies are organic. They are either growing or shrinking. The lack of direction may take a while to have an impact, but eventually performance will suffer. Getting owners to re-engage after time away can be exceedingly difficult, but if they don’t, the transition is unlikely to accomplish their objectives. “Death from Over-Attention” The second obstacle to successfully implementing a transition occurs when owners have surrendered their task-based duties. In this case, they are unable to define their contribution in the absence of being “busy.” They begin looking for ways to contribute, often where their contribution isn’t needed. It’s not uncommon to begin demanding more accountability and greater detail than is really necessary. He or she pours over reports looking for errors, anomalies or declining results in an attempt to prove added value. Another technique used to prove contribution is “seagull management”. An owner may look for opportunities to make decisions, but does it without consulting the managers who are in charge of the function. Because they have always known best, they still know best. What isn’t as obvious is that they are now are working in a vacuum, with little knowledge of what went before. The results are usually not ideal. A third way owners might evidence over attention is with a “break the rules” mentality. They offer exemptions from policy, or circumnavigate systems because they can. Exercising authority shows who is in charge, even if there is little apparent responsibility. Preventing the Owner Obstacles We call these “good” obstacles because they typically occur only after some level of initial success in the exit planning process. They are a direct result of relieving owners of the more mundane duties of management, and freeing them up for more effective leadership. Each is preventable with some preparation. Either issue can be forestalled by including the owner’s next level of responsibility in the planning process. If the owner resists retained responsibilities, then the future become plain. Plans can then include transfer of higher functions to the management team. If the owner insists on retaining a level of day-to-day control, the coaching process should include defined parameters about what reporting is really necessary, and how often it will be presented. In either case, owner obstacles occur when the owner is crossing the no man’s land between total focus on the business and the time when it isn’t a recipient of their attention at all. Like any no man’s land, it is unfamiliar territory, and some pathfinding is necessary. That is the exit planning coach’s job. This article was originally published by John F. Dini, CBEC, CExP, CEPA on
Defining the role of a coach on your exit planning team doesn’t just happen. Like any other aspect of working with consultants, you need to set expectations upfront. Many advisors like to characterize themselves as the “quarterback” of a transition planning team. I’ve always objected to that. We regard the business owner as the quarterback of the planning process. After all, the coach never gets sacked by a 300-pound defensive lineman. The advisor may want to win every bit as much as the business owner, but it’s the owner who actually has skin in the game. A Coach’s Responsibilities It’s one thing to say that you are a coach and another to act like it. Here are seven basic rules an owner should expect from the coach on a planning team.
We have been asked to explain our product and services on multiple occasions. For those interested, you may find this episode to be a good listen, as it fully explores our services and how our involvement can significantly benefit your client. While this particular episode deals with land sales, the concept is universal to the sale of personal property, business and other appreciated assets.
For more information on the benefits of this IRC Section 453 solution, give this podcast a listen. While the topic of this episode dealt with the sale of land, the solution is also available to individuals selling their business, allowing them the unique opportunity to defer immediate tax obligations and maximize the sale through personally designed future annuity payments.
Jul 28, 2023
Jul 28, 2023
1 min read
Popular
What's Trending
What is your goal for your business? As fractional CFOs, when we first meet with our clients, this is among the first questions we ask. Your goals will inform much of our work supporting your company – whether we focus on preparing you for a near-future exit or growing and building the value of your business over time. This is what makes our fractional CFOs – many of whom are also CEPAs – a vital (and often missing) piece of the exit planning puzzle. Many business owners enlist exit planning experts as they approach the exit process, bringing in an army of resources to make the most out of what has already been built. A fractional CFO, however, becomes embedded in your business over time and, in the process, comes to serve as a value growth advisor – a financial expert who can help you
There is a common misconception that what an employee does outside the workplace, particularly on social media, is not the employer’s responsibility.
ROBS – or use funds from their existing personal 401(k) or other retirement accounts as capital for buying a business. In addition to creating cash flow and minimizing the use of debt, ROBS are an attractive source of funds unlocking value from an individual’s retirement savings to fund a business, what are the tax advantages that make considering a ROBS strategy worthwhile? First, there is the aspect of tax deferral. Financing through ROBS avoids the early withdrawal penalty normally incurred when funds are withdrawn from retirement savings prior to retirement. When you use the capital from your 401(k) to fund a new income taxes or penalties, more money is available to go into the business, thus maximizing your available capital. In addition to increasing capital efficiency, you avoid loan obligations because ROBS is not a debt product. It’s simply accessing the equity you already have built up in your retirement plan, so there’s no monthly repayments or interest like you would incur with a loan. Accessing Business Capital Through ROBS Here are some points to remember about how the flow of money works when using a ROBS strategy: The new business entity to be funded must specifically be established as a C-Corp. After a new 401(k) or profit-sharing plan is the business advisory space and how to implement a ROBS strategy. For a consultation on your business plans and objectives, please contact us at 770.740.0797 or email info2@SJGorowitz.com.
As a small business owner, your instinct might tell you to seize every opportunity that knocks on your door. Let’s face it: saying yes can be a thrilling ride into new ventures. Sometimes, you need to remind yourself of your organizational Sweet Spot. Does your team have the bandwidth, the people power, and the infrastructure to take it on? Sometimes, saying no is not just the better option; it’s a powerhouse move that aligns your business with your growth goal. Here’s the lowdown on when, how, and why flexing your “no” muscle is your smartest play. The Unmanageable Yes When you’re overcommitted and under-resourced, every additional yes is like adding more weight to an already overstretched team. If saying yes means sacrificing the quality of your work, spreading your resources thin, or burning out your team, then it’s time for a firm, resolute “no.” Remember, quality over quantity isn’t just a great saying – it’s the golden rule for sustainable growth. The Misaligned Opportunity Some opportunities seem golden on the surface, but they won’t help you achieve your business mission, vision, or values. Listen up: Your business is your compass; every decision should steer you to your true north. If it doesn’t fit, say no. It’s not just about avoiding the wrong turn; it’s about staying true to your course and your team’s potential. The Power of Prioritization Here’s a reality check—you can’t do it all. When you say no to less important things, you say yes to more focus, energy, and time for what truly matters. Embrace the art of prioritization because knowing what to decline is as vital as knowing what to pursue. Make your yes count! Cultivating Respect Saying no isn’t just about protecting your time and energy; it’s about setting boundaries. Assertiveness isn’t rude; it’s a sign of respect – for yourself, your team, and your business’s vision. When you respect your limits, others will follow suit. It signals to the world that your time, team, and resources are valuable. Conclusion Saying no is a tough decision. It’s not a negative judgment; it’s a selective choice. Think of the word no as a complete sentence and a powerful tool to guide your business to where it truly belongs. So, the next time you’re faced with a request that doesn’t feel right, plant your feet, take a deep breath, and remember that saying no is not just okay—it’s essential for your business’s health and ongoing success. Do you need to get in your Owner Sweet Spot?
GAAP traps often occur when a business owner sells a company to a third party. The transaction is commonly memorialized by a Purchase Agreement. That agreement contains certain representations (or “reps”) and warranties. Some of these are common sense and should pose no problem to someone who has operated a good business. The Accounts Receivable represent money that is actually owed to the company. Taxes have been filed on a timely basis. The seller doesn’t know of any pending litigation. The owner has the right and authority to enter into a sale agreement. There is one, however, that is frequently required by attorneys who don’t understand privately held business, and agreed to by owners and their attorneys who don’t understand what they are guaranteeing. They are Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP. What is GAAP? To start, the term “Generally Accepted” is misleading. It could easily be interpreted as “what everyone typically does.” Nothing could be further from the truth. GAAP is determined by two organizations, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Per I
Previous
Next
Explore the Knowledge Exchange
Make XPX Part of Your Business Plans
Explore
Learn
Account
Connect
Help & Support
© 2024 XPX Global LLC. Privacy Policy Norms & Principles Site Map Terms of Use
© 2024 XPX Global LLC. All Rights Reserved.