Workplace

Early last month, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) proposed the Heat Injury and Illness Prevention in Outdoor and Indoor Work Settings rule. The aim is to curb heat related injuries or death which OSHA identifies as “the leading cause of death among all hazardous weather conditions in the United States.” The proposal places new responsibilities on employers: establishing heat thresholds, developing Heat Injury and Illness Prevention Plans, regularly monitoring temperatures, and establishing safety measures when heat thresholds are met. This rule is yet to be finalized however, it is a sign of what’s to come. The standard applies to all employers except for the following: Work activities for which there is no reasonable expectation of exposure at or above the initial heat trigger. Short duration employee exposures at or above the initial heat trigger of 15 minutes or less in any 60-minute period. Organizations whose primary function is the performance of firefighting and other certain emergency services. Work activities performed in indoor work areas or vehicles where air conditioning consistently keeps the ambient temperature below 80°F. Telework (work from home). Sedentary work activities at indoor work areas that only involve some combination of the following: sitting, occasional standing and walking for brief periods of time, and occasional lifting of objects weighing less than 10 pounds. Heat Thresholds There are two heat thresholds which will trigger employer action: An “initial heat trigger” means a heat index of 80°F or a wet bulb globe temperature (defined below) equal to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Alert Limit; and A “high heat trigger” means a heat index of 90°F or a wet bulb globe temperature equal to the NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limit. The “heat index” is calculated by measuring the ambient temperature and humidity. Wet bulb globe temperature is a heat metric that considers ambient temperature, humidity, radiant heat from sunlight or artificial heat sources and air movement. Employers may choose either method of measuring the temperature.   Heat Injury and Illness Prevention Plan (HIIPP) Requirements If an employer does not fall under the exceptions, it must develop a HIIPP with the input of non-managerial employees and their representatives for occasions when the heat threshold is surpassed. This plan may vary on the worksite but must be written if the employer has more than 10 employees and use a language employees will understand. The HIIPP must contain: A comprehensive list of the type of work activities covered by the HIIPP Policies and procedures needed to remain compliant with the standard. Identification of which heat metric the employer will use heat index or wet bulb globe temperature. A plan for when the heat threshold is met. Along with creating the HIIPP, employers must designate one or more “heat safety coordinators” responsible for implementing and monitoring the HIIPP. The HIIPP must be reviewed at least annually or whenever a heat related injury or illness results in death, days off work, medical treatment exceeding first aid, or loss of consciousness. Employers must seek input from non-managerial employees and their representatives during any reviews or updates. The definition of “representative” is not defined; if this is broadly defined, this could be a major complexity employers must face. Identifying Heat Hazards Employers must monitor heat conditions at outdoor work areas by: Monitoring temperatures at a sufficient frequency; and Track heat index forecasts or Measure the heat index or wet bulb globe temperature at or as close as possible to the work areas. For indoor work areas, employers must: Identify work areas where there is an expectation that employees will be exposed to heat at or above the initial heat trigger; and Create a monitoring plan covering each identified work area and include this work area in the HIIPP. Employers must evaluate affected work areas and update their monitoring plan whenever there is a change in production processes or a substantial increase to the outdoor temperature. The heat metric employers choose will affect the thresholds. If no heat metric is specified, the heat metric will be the heat index value.  Employers are exempt from monitoring if they assume the temperature is at or above both the initial and high heat trigger, in which case they must follow the controls below. Control Measures When Heat Triggers are Met When the initial heat trigger is met, employers must: Provide cool accessible drinking water of sufficient quantity (1 quart per employee per hour). Provide break areas at outdoor worksites with natural shade, artificial shade, or air conditioning (if in an enclosed space). Provide break areas at indoor worksites with air conditioning or increased air movement, and if necessary de-humidification. For indoor work areas, provide air conditioning or have increased air movement, and if necessary de-humidification. In cases of radiant heat sources, other measures must be taken (e.g., shielding/barriers and isolating heat sources). Provide employees a minimum 15-minute paid rest break in break areas at least every two hours (a paid or unpaid meal break may count as a rest break). Allow and encourage employees to take paid rest breaks to prevent overheating. At ambient temperatures above 102° F, evaluate humidity to determine if fan use is harmful. Provide acclimatization plans for new employees or employees who have been away for more than 2 weeks. Maintain effective two-way communication between management and employees. Implement a system to observe signs and symptoms of heat related problems (e.g., a Buddy system). When the high heat trigger is met, employers are additionally required to: Provide employees with hazard notifications prior to the work shift or upon determining the high heat trigger is met which includes: the importance of drinking water, employees right to take rest breaks, how to seek help in a heat emergency, and the location of break areas and water. Place warning signs at indoor work areas with ambient temperatures exceeding 102° F. Other Requirements Training: all employees and supervisors expected to perform work above the heat thresholds must be trained before starting such work and annually.   What’s Next? The rule is yet to be published in the Federal Register. Once this happens, there will be a 120-day comment period when all members of the public may offer OSHA their opinion about the rule. Whether this rule comes to fruition may also depend on which party wins the White House. Furthermore, if finalized this rule would likely be challenged in the courts, which now have more discretion to overrule agency rules following the US Supreme court case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Relentless Inc. v. Department of Commerce (overturning the Chevron deference decision). Employers should review their heat illness prevention policies to maintain compliance with regulations. If you have questions, call competent labor and employment counsel. Brody and Associates regularly advises management on complying with the latest local, state and federal employment laws.  If we can be of assistance in this area, please contact us at info@brodyandassociates.com or 203.454.0560  

For five decades, the southern United States has been an attractive location for automakers to open plants thanks to generous tax breaks and cheaper, non-union labor. However, after decades of failing to unionize automakers in the South, the United Auto Workers dealt a serious blow to that model by winning a landslide union victory at Volkswagen. In an effort to fight back, three southern states have gotten creative: they passed laws barring companies from receiving state grants, loans and tax incentives if the company voluntarily recognizes a union or voluntarily provides unions with employee information. The laws also allow the government to claw back incentive payments after they were made. While these laws are very similar, each law has unique nuances. If you are in an impacted state, you should seek local counsel. In 2023, Tennessee was the first state to pass such a law. This year, Georgia and Alabama followed suit. So why this push? In 2023, the American Legislative Exchange Council (“ALEC”), a nonprofit organization of conservative state legislators and private sector representatives who draft and share model legislation for distribution among state governments, adopted Tennessee’s law as model legislation. In fact, the primary sponsor of Tennessee’s bill was recognized as an ALEC Policy Champion in March 2023. ALEC’s push comes as voluntary recognition of unions gains popularity as an alternative to fighting unions. We recently saw this with the high-profile Ben & Jerry’s voluntary recognition. Will this Southern strategy work to push back against growing union successes? Time will tell. Brody and Associates regularly advises its clients on all labor management issues, including union-related matters, and provides union-free training.  If we can be of assistance in this area, please contact us at info@brodyandassociates.com or 203.454.0560.  

In March 2022, Florida enacted the politically charged Individual Freedom Act, informally known as the STOP WOKE (Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees) Act. Less than two years later, the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Eleventh Circuit blocked the enforcement of the Act on the grounds it violates employers’ right to free speech. This decision directly impacts employers in the Eleventh Circuit and will have a ripple effect on employers nationally.   How did the Individual Freedom Act (Stop WOKE Act) affect employers? The Act attempted to prevent employers from mandating training or meetings for employees which “promote” a “certain set of beliefs” the state “found offensive” and discriminatory. There are eight prohibited beliefs each relating to race, color, sex, and national origin. According to the Act, employers must not teach the following: Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally superior to members of another race, color, sex, or national origin. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously. An individual’s moral character or status as either privileged or oppressed is determined by his or her race, color, sex, or national origin. Members of one race, color, sex, or national origin cannot and should not attempt to treat others without respect due to race, color, sex, or national origin. An individual, based on his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, bears responsibility for, or should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment because of, actions committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, sex, or national origin. An individual, based on his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, should be discriminated against or receive adverse treatment to achieve diversity, equity, or inclusion. An individual, by virtue of his or her race, color, sex, or national origin, bears personal responsibility for and must feel guilt, anguish, or other forms of psychological distress because of actions, in which the individual played no part, and were committed in the past by other members of the same race, color, sex, or national origin. Such virtues as merit, excellence, hard work, fairness, neutrality, objectivity, and racial colorblindness are racist or sexist, or were created by members of a particular race, color, sex, or national origin to oppress members of another race, color, sex, or national origin. Employers still had the ability to mandate employees attend sessions that either refute these concepts or present them in an “objective manner without endorsement.” This dictates how an employer deals with its employees and is particularly limiting in how employers address discrimination training. Employers who failed to adhere to the law were liable for “serious financial penalties—back pay, compensatory damages, and up to $100,000 in punitive damages, plus attorney’s fees—on top of injunctive relief.”   The Ruling – Honeyfund.com Inc. v. Governor [2024] In March 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Eleventh Circuit served an injunction preventing enforcement of the Act. Despite the state insisting the Act banned conduct rather than speech, the court ruled the Act unlawfully violated the First Amendment’s right of free speech by barring speech based on its content and penalizing certain viewpoints. While certain categories of speech such as “obscenity, fighting words, incitement, and the like” are traditionally unprotected, the court pointed out that “new categories of unprotected speech may not be added to the list by a legislature that concludes certain speech is too harmful to be tolerated.” Florida is keen to appeal against the decision.   What does this mean for employers? Regardless of one’s opinions on the matter, this can be viewed positively from an employer’s standpoint. Employers in the private sector can control speech in the workplace, and this ruling confirms their autonomy will continue. Whether or not the rest of the country will follow suit remains to be seen. This case, in tandem with the US Supreme Court’s ruling to ban race based affirmative action, signals today’s intense political climate is likely to continue to impact how employer diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are approached. Employers should continue to review their DEI initiatives, ensuring they are in line with the latest precedents. Brody and Associates regularly advises management on complying with the latest local, state and federal employment laws.  If we can be of assistance in this area, please contact us at info@brodyandassociates.com or 203.454.0560      

Last month, the Boston Regional Office of the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB”) ruled that members of the Dartmouth men’s basketball team are employees and as such have the right to unionize. Wasting no time, yesterday, the Dartmouth men’s basketball team voted 13-2 to unionize.  Many educational industry onlookers saw this as the necessary next step in granting employment status to all college athletes – not just the national powerhouses. Although the decision is expected to be appealed, there is no doubt the decision, if upheld, will mark a seismic shift in collegiate athletics.  Why?  Because if Dartmouth men’s basketball players are employees, then arguably all collegiate athletes, both men and women, in all divisions, should also be considered employees eligible for unionization and maybe even compensation. Why Does this Sound Familiar? For those of you who follow college athletics closely or who happen to be closet labor and employment law buffs, you will know the recent Dartmouth NLRB decision is not unprecedented.  In fact, a similar ruling was issued nearly a decade ago when the Northwestern football players were determined (by a different Regional Office of the NLRB) to be employees and able to unionize. However, back then, a unanimous NLRB overturned that decision. One of the reasons the NLRB overturned the lower decision was because the NLRB only has jurisdiction over private employers. Although Northwestern is a private school it competes in the Big Ten athletic conference, which, except for Northwestern, was comprised exclusively of public universities at that time.  The NLRB found it should not exercise jurisdiction over the matter because permitting one school in the conference to collectively bargain (and therefore pay their athletes) and not the others would be detrimental to college athletics because the playing field would no longer be level among different schools.  While some found this argument weak, it carried the day. What’s Next? Fortunately for the Dartmouth men’s basketball team, the above argument will not be an issue this time as Dartmouth competes in a conference composed entirely of private schools, the Ivy League. Likely even more important, the NLRB’s General Counsel (chief prosecutor), Jennifer Abruzzo, has previously come out strongly in favor of student-athletes being treated as employees protected under the National Labor Relations Act. Despite all of this, the process will not be a slam dunk for the basketball team (sorry, we could not help ourselves).  While the next step is a hearing before a pro-union, Biden-appointed NLRB, the following step(s) will be the federal courts and what happens there is uncertain. Both Dartmouth and the NCAA have come out strongly against the decision insisting that their athletes are not employees but rather unpaid amateur students. The NCAA also predicts dire consequences for college athletics if athletes become subject to the NLRA (and other federal and state employment laws). For example, if athletes are “employees” under the wage and hour laws, they are entitled to pay- which is a direct violation of the NCAA’s prohibition against “pay for play.” As a result, we expect an exhaustive legal battle that will take years to play out.  Unfortunately for Dartmouth and the NCAA, these legal challenges will work their way through a court system that recently delivered a major win to college athletes in an antitrust case that went all the way to the Supreme Court.  If that is where this latest case ends up, it will be heard before many of the same justices who unanimously found against the NCAA when it decided the NCAA’s imposition of strict limits on compensation for student-athletes for education-related benefits violated antitrust law. While the appeal is pending,  we expect to see an influx of other petitions filed by other student-athletes to have their teams unionized. Union activity on college campuses is already high; this decision will likely just make it higher. If the student-athletes are ultimately successful, these actions could lead to a complete upheaval of athletic programs on college campuses. Imagine if colleges can give their star athletes massive salaries. The smaller programs will almost never be able to attract top talent which means only the richest few will be competitive.  We may have seen our last Cinderella story. Closing Thoughts The time seems right for the NLRB to act on this issue. With the strong pro-labor tailwinds currently in Washington, D.C., it seems likelier than not that this ruling will be upheld by the NLRB.  What happens on appeal to the federal courts is anyone’s guess and could ultimately be decided by who wins the White House later this year. We will monitor this issue closely and provide our readers with updates as they become available.  Brody and Associates regularly advises its clients on union-related matters and provides union-free training.  If we can be of assistance in this area, please contact us at info@brodyandassociates.com or 203.454.0560.

In the fast-paced landscape of today’s organizations, the missing link that often separates successful ventures from mediocre ones is trust. Trust is the glue that binds leaders with their stakeholders, creating an environment where collaboration thrives, innovation flourishes, and everyone feels valued. To bridge this trust gap, we propose a formula that encapsulates the essence of effective leadership—the 5 C’s of Leadership. 1. Communication: The Foundation of Relational Trust At the core of the 5 C’s lies communication, the bedrock upon which trust is built. It goes beyond merely transmitting information; effective communication involves active listening to understand and speaking to be understood. Leaders must foster an environment where every voice is heard, creating a sense of openness and transparency. When communication flows freely, trust is nurtured, and stakeholders feel a genuine connection with the leadership. 2. Connection: Managing by Walking Around Connection is the second pillar, urging leaders to step out of their offices and immerse themselves in the daily rhythm of the organization. It involves spending quality time with team members, being present when they start their day, and showing appreciation at the day’s end. But connection extends beyond internal teams—it encompasses engaging with customers, vendors, and community leaders. By sharing the organization’s mission, vision, and values, leaders build bridges that connect diverse stakeholders, fostering a sense of unity and common purpose. 3. Commitment: Anchoring to Mission, Vision, and Values Commitment is the anchor that prevents leadership from drifting into uncertainty. Leaders must be steadfast in their dedication to the company’s mission, vision, and values. This commitment goes beyond lip service; it involves actively shaping and building the organizational culture. When stakeholders witness leaders unwaveringly dedicated to a common goal, trust is solidified, creating a stable foundation for growth and collaboration. 4. Care: Nurturing Your People Care is the empathetic thread that weaves through the fabric of trust. Leaders must genuinely care for their people, recognizing them as individuals with unique needs and aspirations. This involves not only professional development but also a focus on the overall well-being of the team. By demonstrating genuine concern for the individuals within the organization, leaders cultivate a culture of trust, where each person feels valued and supported. 5. Curiosity: A Leader’s Lifelong Learning Journey Remaining curious is the fuel that propels a leader’s journey towards growth and success. Acknowledging that there is always more to learn, leaders should invest time in asking questions, seeking different perspectives, and gathering input from diverse sources. This curiosity leads to a more robust decision-making process and better outcomes. Embracing a mindset of continuous learning not only inspires trust but also fosters an environment of innovation and adaptability. Incorporating these 5 C’s into leadership practices provides a comprehensive roadmap for building and maintaining trust with stakeholders. It is not a one-time effort but an ongoing commitment to fostering a culture of trust, openness, and collaboration. As leaders strive to implement these principles, they will witness the transformational impact on organizational dynamics. Trust becomes the catalyst for enhanced teamwork, increased productivity, and a shared commitment to achieving common goals. In an era where trust is often a scarce commodity, leaders who embrace the 5 C’s will stand out as beacons of authenticity and reliability, guiding their organizations toward sustained success and growth.

CBIZ Health Care Survey Shows Employers Prioritize Recruiting and Retaining Talent in Hot Job Market Survey also finds employers are prioritizing stemming the rising costs of medical plans and the inclusion of mental healthcare services Business Wire CLEVELAND — March 15, 2023 CBIZ (NYSE: CBZ), a leading national provider of insurance, financial and advisory services, released its inaugural 2023 State of Health Care survey that shows recruiting talent (67%) and retaining talent (64%) as top priorities for employers, trends driven by a hot job market despite concerns of a recession later this year. The State of Health Care survey includes responses from 869 businesses with at least 100 employees, spanning 41 states and 26 industries. The survey provides insight into employer priorities, top health plan features, and emerging mental and physical health benefit trends to watch through the remainder of 2023. “Employers continue to show an eagerness for recruiting the best and the brightest talent and to identify and retain those employees who have the best growth trajectory,” said Jay Meschke, President of CBIZ Talent & Compensation Solutions. “Since 2020, employers have had to respond quickly to drastic shifts in social and economic conditions and this year will be no different.” Controlling medical costs is a top priority for 49% of businesses. This comes as industry experts project a six to eight percent increase in employers’ health care costs due to rebounding utilization, or rising use of medical providers, and the rise in prescription drug costs. Cost-containment strategies businesses are implementing include reference-based pricing, alternative funding arrangements and enhanced use of telemedicine. Polly Thomas, Business Unit President, Employee Benefits added: “The survey showed that emerging trends and the priorities in the health care and benefits spaces are changing. This data will serve as a guide for businesses looking to modernize their benefits programs that mitigate risks and costs, while improving their employees’ health care experience.” The data was assessed from an overall perspective, as well as based on company size and industry. An interactive infographic with the results is available on the CBIZ website. Additional key findings include: * Almost 35% of employers that don’t offer mental health wellbeing resources through their plans are open to considering options – Despite opting to provide coverage plans that do not offer certain mental health services, nearly 35% of businesses indicated they would like to learn more about offerings for mental health programs. Interest surpassed consideration of other offerings like weight management (18.7%) and financial wellbeing (14.7%). * The majority of businesses provide mental health resources for their employees – 80 percent of employers offer mental health resources through an employee assistance program, while 68 percent provide counseling through their medical plans. * Nearly two in three businesses offer a wellbeing program for employees – With retaining talent being the second most valued priority for the employers surveyed, 61.9% are looking to attract and retain high-performing employees in part by offering a comprehensive benefits program that includes a wellbeing component. * 82% of employers include options for virtual behavioral health consultations – Employers are providing workers with increased options to meet with their medical professionals, both as a convenience and to help mitigate health and safety concerns amid the ongoing impact of COVID-19.

When the COVID-19 pandemic forced companies to close their doors, sending employees home to work remotely, many leaders worried about the long-tail effects on culture, employee engagement, and morale. As it turns out, some of those concerns were unfounded. 

Employees have adopted a consumer mindset about who they work for, and the value a company provides to their personal and professional life.  They are focused holistically on the ability to share in cultural matters as part of a broad community effort. Small business leaders must adapt to employee mindfulness about their career experience. With the right focus, you can become a company that attracts, engages, and retains your conscious consumer workforce. As the country navigates inflation, conscious consumers are placing emphasis on value.  Today’s conscious consumers want to feel as if they’re making responsible buying decisions and investment decisions in their careers too.  This includes sentiments like whether there is perceived and experienced personal value at a company. The pandemic stimulated a change in spending habits as Americans considered where products came from, how they were produced, and how best to access necessary products and services.  In the wake of 2020, business leaders have seen these considerations turn into workplace demands. Employees, particularly the Gen Z and Millennial generations, regard sustainability, diversity and inclusion, and the public stance a company takes on social issues, to be strong factors in their buying decisions (McKinsey.)  These factors are also showing up in the decision about where they will work. How do small business leaders adapt? Business transparency is a factor. Companies that find the sweet spot between great value, sustainability, and inclusion will come out on top in the years to come.   Environmental, social and governance (ESG) is a big topic today. Let’s talk about small business adaptation of this three-part approach to doing business.  Think of your employees as stakeholders in a shared vision.  ESG standards guide small business owners in leading their workforce.  With clear ESG standards, your small business workforce become strong contributors to company growth and sustainability. Consider clear standards.  American workforce is paying attention to how you hire and the value you offer to employees.  As consumers, your employees want to represent and support organizations that elevate people and demonstrate that they care about what’s going on in the world.  When’s the last time your company helped during a crisis?  What causes does your company stand behind?  The company that wins in the future is a culture that represents the interests of its consumer base, its workforce. The small business workforce as a strong community with shared purpose provides internal guardrails for navigating healthy relationships. Know your influence on your employee consumers A company should consider the major social platforms to find out what their employee consumers are saying about their products/services.  This is a level of marketing research that can be a strategic turning point. Consumers are eager to make their voices heard on social media. They have no qualms about bashing or praising a company and 70% of Gen Z and Millennials cite social media as a key influence. (McKinsey) What a company offers isn’t the only topic of discussion.  Your company image, who you represent, and best practices are topics of discussion and shared on social platforms.   Taking into account rising inflation and your company response, your employees want to be part of a shared mission, to support a business that is working toward companywide inclusivity, diversity, and advancement.  People are listening to influencers on social media who champion the efforts of companies that are making these an actionable priority. Don’t be shy about your accomplishments.  Social media platforms are an opportunity to communicate with your markets and your employees.  Use these platforms to bring attention to the issues you support so your employee consumer can learn more about you; then pay attention to their feedback.  Share your accomplishments and your employees will participate.  The fact that the gender gap is razor-thin among your senior-level staff should be celebrated.  Sharing moments from open-discussion events would do wonders to establish your reputation on diversity and inclusion, and for causes you care about. Summary American consumers are using their purchasing power to support the changes they want to see in the world.  Small business leaders should evaluate their internal value proposition, and where needed, adjust to the shifting priorities of their workforce.  Inflation is triggering more cautious spending, and consumers want to feel good about where that money is going.  The conscious consumer has an impact on employee thinking about career choices.  A business that demonstrates a commitment to employee well-being, adds value that matters, and has staying power.   Social media is a viable tool for getting real-time reactions to your product/service or announcements from your workforce and your client base.  American small business leaders should consider social media an integral part of your business strategy.

Being new at anything is difficult for a period. New team members try to get their bearings and begin to feel like a resident member of the company. This month a newcomer provided a critical reminder of the one factor which significantly influences the first week on the job. Why is this important to leaders?  Employers have to consider a new internal reset for retaining people. Navigating a new set of employee viewpoints for a preferred work relationship is not sufficient if only in conversation. Your chances of retaining people in today’s fight for talent increases when you connect them on day one of your new relationship. “Day one” provokes a blend of emotions. There is anticipation of interactions with a new team, even though you may have met some of them during the selection process.  A planned and structured agenda for key introductions and process training that includes specific outcomes will increase the engagement of new team members. There are feelings of excitement. New members will set out to make a personal contribution to organizational goals. On the first day at a new job, most newcomers expect a positive experience.  They will consider how their new peers work individually and collaboratively as they navigate their first week. They look forward to an agenda for learning the details of their new role. Margaret is a strategic communications professional. She has been looking forward to starting a new position at a top firm in her industry. She felt the usual emotions going into “day one” but her experience caused her to take pause.  At the end of day one, Margaret wondered how this well-established corporate team missed an important set up of their new relationship. Instead of a planned introduction to her team and her role, she was left to make introductions around the office and determine how to fill her time for an entire week before initial training was scheduled. What tasks was she to prioritize? Where was her team on day one? Would she be part of the business culture? What would help her to acclimate emotionally and professionally? Definition of critical onboarding steps. While many companies include some onboarding steps, the definition of this critical process varies dramatically. For small businesses, onboarding is a primary strategy for attracting and keeping top performers. This is one thing that will make a positive first impression and ensure that your initial working relationship phase will have a strong start.  Onboarding lays the groundwork for a lasting professional affiliation.  Making a new team member want to stay is difficult when an onboarding plan is missing. Three essential factors will ensure your new team member will decide to stay a while. Have an onboarding plan ready on day one. Do not skip this step; take the time to generate a plan that includes priorities for the initial 90-day period. You don’t have to iron out all the details, and the agenda can be edited in advance of each 30-day period. Your onboarding plan should include an illustration of role priorities for the initial period and for the long-term evolution of the role. Commit to giving ample thought to the experience of the early working phase as a set up for a long-term association. Expectations and priorities must include who and what. Depending on the level of your new team member, you want to give him or her the right framework for a productive first day, first week. Day one should include who they will have a regular interface with, and what they will achieve together. Your new team member will have the insight and direction to determine their priorities. A timeline is critical. Everyone wants to know what is expected of their time and energy in a new role. Priorities and expectations are in focus, now you should coordinate these within two to three identifiable periods of time. With an illustration of priorities and timelines, a new team member can easily determine how to spend time and energy during each specified period. Now the execution of the role during the initial period will occur with optimum productivity and performance can be reviewed at the completion of each specified period. A first impression is made at the time of candidate selection. A mutual agreement to work together is confirmed at hiring, and a new team member’s transition into a lasting affiliation starts on day one. Do not skip this step, your new team member will thank you!

By Robert G. Brody and Luis A. Torres   The Biden Administration’s unbridled support of Labor continues.  National Labor Relations  Board (NLRB) General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo, the NLRB’s chief prosecutor, released an advice memorandum on May 25, 2022, arguing that the Board has improperly been allowing employers to ban unions from accessing portions of their property held open to the public. The NLRB is urging private property rights take a back seat to the right to unionize.   Abruzzo issued the advice memorandum in response to LT Transportation, Case 05-CA-281-089. In LT Transportation, a union was trying to unionize bus drivers. As part of their efforts the union had their representatives stationed along bus stops, which the bus company privately owned but held open to the public. The Company ordered the union off the bus stop property and the union filed charging claiming this was illegal.   When the union successfully unionized the bus drivers they withdrew its complaint against LT Transportation. However, while the case was pending, Abruzzo argued the union’s activities should be allowed and Board precedent disallowing these actions should be overturned.   The basis of Abruzzo’s argument is that current Board precedent is contrary to the Supreme Court’s decision in NLRB v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105 (1956). The Supreme Court ruled that employers could exclude non-employee union representatives in select circumstances. Subsequent Board interpretation allowed employers to ban union representatives from public property if the employees are otherwise accessible to the union. However, employer bans were not allowed if the employer discriminates against the union by allowing other groups to access the public spaces.   If Abruzzo has her way, employers will be forced to allow union representatives access to all portions of their property held open to the public. This is a large departure from Board precedent. This is one of the many initiatives Abruzzo is simultaneously pursuing. If you hold portions of your property open for public use, be on the lookout for updates.   Brody and Associates regularly advises management on all issues involving unions, staying union-free, complying with the newest decision issued by the NLRB, and training management on how to deal with all these challenges.  If we can be of assistance in this area, please contact us at info@brodyandassociates.com or 203.454.0560

Embracing DEI as Part of Your Recruitment/Retention Strategy More employers have come to embrace diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives as a way to improve workplace culture and demonstrate they value their employees as people, not just workers. Harvard Business Review found that 65% of U.S. executives say DEI is a high strategic priority, and organizations on the leading edge report multiple organizational benefits related to their DEI work, including increased employee engagement, innovation and success in recruiting and retaining employees.3 Additional studies suggest that taking the right actions to improve DEI can also lead to better financial outcomes for the organization.

Popular

What's Trending

As small business owners and leaders, we’re no strangers to the daily grind of comparison and competition. It’s easy to look at the success of others and wonder if we measure up. But this Thanksgiving, we’re taking a page out of Heather Holleman’s novel1, “Seated with Christ: Living Freely in a Culture of Comparison,” and the transformative words of Ephesians 2:6: “God raised us up with Christ and seated us with Him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus.” In the hustle to prove our worth and carve out a place in the market, realizing that your seat at the table is already secured is revolutionary. This isn’t about your turnover, your team size, or the number of followers on social media. It’s about recognizing the value you bring to the table just by being you, backed by the firepower of your determination, creativity, and the unique vision only you possess for your business. The Overlooked Seats Comparison is the thief of joy in business, and it’s also the thief of innovation and growth. The environment of inauthentic seats fuels comparison, the moment you and your team stop eyeing the lane beside you is the moment you turbocharge your path forward. Your business isn’t like anyone else’s—for a reason. The individual strengths and talents within your team are your biggest asset, waiting to be unleashed. Recognize and harness the power of these unique capabilities to drive people-powered change. A Secure Seat on The Team Your team—the one you’ve built, trained, and grown—holds untapped potential. Just as we are seated with Christ in a place of honor and security, so too should our team members feel valued and vital to our mission. This Thanksgiving, let’s take a moment to express genuine gratitude for the diverse skill set each member brings to the table. When people feel valued, they’re more engaged, productive, and innovative. And that’s how a small business not only survives but thrives. The Power of People-Powered Change FIREPOWER Teams is founded on the belief that the power of a small business lies in its people. “Fuel your people power” isn’t just a motto; it’s a mission statement and a call to action. Reflect on how you can empower each team member to contribute their best this holiday season, fully aware that their seat at the table is as non-negotiable as yours. Thanksgiving is a time of gratitude, reflection, and community. As business owners, it’s a prime opportunity to reassess what we’re thankful for and how we express that gratitude through our actions and leadership. Let’s enter this season with a renewed commitment to value ourselves, our team, and all our unique contributions. Let’s reject the ceaseless comparison and instead focus on fostering an environment where everyone feels seated at the table—secure, valued, and ready to make a difference. The entrepreneurship journey is rarely easy, but with a team that genuinely feels like their efforts matter, there’s untold strength to be garnered. Your business, team, and vision have a secured seat at the table. Let’s give thanks for that incredible opportunity and the journey ahead. Conclusion Remember, the most sustainable growth comes from within. Thanksgiving is a time to rekindle our appreciation for the value we each bring to the table, reminding us that when we work together, there’s nothing we can’t achieve.

“The purpose of middlemen in the marketplace is to provide time and place utility.” I remember the light bulb going on in Economics 101 when my professor said that.  Suddenly, I understood the concept of added value. Someone had to get the product to the customer. “After all,” the professor continued, “The footwear manufacturer in Massachusetts can’t sell a pair of shoes directly to someone in California. They can’t manufacture and handle thousands of customers. It would be a nightmare, and completely unprofitable.” The fact that Massachusetts was still known for shoe manufacturing gives you some idea of how long ago this took place. So long ago, in fact, that Zappos wasn’t even a word yet. The independent shoe retailer gave way to the department stores. In turn their shoe business was decimated by the specialty chain retailers. In fact, most shoe departments in Macy’s and others are actually chain operations within the store. Shoe sales moved into sporting goods stores and discounters. While the industry shifted multiple times, they all still provided time and place utility. Then came the Internet. Now the manufacturer can sell directly to consumers. In fact, they can eliminate several layers of middlemen, along with the mark-ups. Lately my area has been swamped with billboards saying “Mattress Dealers are Greedy. TN.com.” TN.com turns out to be My friends at Digital Pro has survived (and thrives) by their differentiation and service. The large, bright showroom is full of computers where they can show customers the effect of adjusting color balance or editing. They can print your lifetime memories on almost anything, from a key chain to a large metal panel. They can still give you prints made with permanent liquid ink, not the water soluble powder used by most printers. In addition, they can do all of this online because they’ve invested in the technology necessary to keep up with the “convenience-based” competitors. As the cost of digital printers fell, professional photographers invested in their own machines. Digital Pro Lab has replaced their business with consumers who want to discuss their special moments, choose how to preserve them, and hold the results in their hands before they pay. In an industry where the number of time and place based outlets has fallen by over 90% in the last decade, Digital Pro Lab has beaten the big boys with product differentiation and service. When the time comes for planning an exit, they will have options.       This article was originally published by John F. Dini, CBEC, CExP, CEPA on

On September 18, 2024, a panel of three Third US Circuit Court of Appeals judges heard oral argument from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Starbucks on the matter of consequential damages. At stake is the NLRB’s power to award damages for direct and foreseeable pecuniary harms that go beyond lost pay and benefits. The award of such things as credit card late payment costs and uninsured medical costs, fees for not timely paying other expenses, etc. are at issue. If such awards are within the NLRB’s authority, the damage awards in NLRB wrongful discharge cases could dramatically rise. Here is how we got to this point. In 2023, the NLRB ordered Starbucks to pay consequential damages in a case of the wrongful termination of two pro-union employees. Damages included “direct or foreseeable pecuniary harms incurred as a result of [the employees’ wrongful discharges.]” This case is one of many cases Starbucks faces alleging wrongful discharge of union supporters. If it losses, the monetary cost could be significant. By filing this appeal, Starbucks’s joins companies such as Amazon, SpaceX, and Trader Joe’s in challenging the NLRB’s constitutional authority to exert such enforcement powers. Traditionally, the Board would order reinstatement, backpay and lost benefits in a case of wrongful termination, however this was expanded in 2022. A Board decision in Thryv, Inc., 372 NLRB No. 22 (2021), held employees who are wrongfully terminated should also receive compensation for other pecuniary losses stemming from the termination. Examples include credit card cost, out of pocket medical expenses, mortgages related fees, etc. Such damages can quickly add up. In this latest Starbucks case, the Third Circuit considered Thryv  but also the US Supreme Court’s June ruling in Jarkesy v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and its applicability to the NLRB. In Jarkesy, the Supreme Court found it was unconstitutional for the SEC to impose civil penalties in administrative cases. Such awards need to be awarded in a court. The Third Circuit must decide whether the expanded remedies sought by the NLRB would be considered “legal remedies” typically imposed by the courts as in Jarkesy or “equitable remedies” typically imposed by administrative agencies. Such administrative remedies are intended to benefit the worker rather than unfairly punish employers. The NLRB argued they have the authority to impose the remedies regardless of their status as legal or equitable. Not surprisingly, Starbucks argued allowing the NLRB to issue damages beyond backpay would violate their constitutional right to a jury trial and therefore was unconstitutional. The outcome is pending and regardless, it may well be appealed to the Supreme Court where the authority of various agencies is being curtailed. We will keep you informed. Brody and Associates regularly advises management on complying with the latest local, state and federal employment laws.  If we can be of assistance in this area, please contact us at info@brodyandassociates.com or 203.454.0560  

Passed in June 2024 and signed into law by New York Governor Kathy Hochul on September 5, the Retail Worker Safety Act is set to take effect March 4, 2025. The law mandates protections for retail employees including panic buttons, workplace violence prevention policies, and training. Who is covered? The law explains: Covered employers: any person, entity, business, corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or an association employing at least ten retail employees. Retail employees: employees working at a retail store for an employer. Retail Store: a store that sells consumer commodities at retail and which is not primarily engaged in the sale of food for consumption on the premises. The state, any political subdivision of the state, a public authority, or any other government agency is not covered by the law. Key Requirements The Act’s key requirements are the installation of panic buttons, implementation of workplace violence prevention policies, and training. The panic button requirement does not take effect until January 1, 2027, while the other requirements are effective March 2025. Panic Button Employers with more than 500 retail employees nationwide must provide employees with access to panic buttons across the workplace. Employers may opt for a physical button or mobile phone-based buttons. The requirements for each are slightly different. If the employer chooses to use a physical panic button it must contact the local 911 public safety answering point when pressed. Pressing the button must provide the answering point with the employee’s location and dispatch law enforcement. The button must be accessible or wearable. The mobile phone-based approach requires the button to be installed on employer provided equipment and is wearable. The mobile button may not track employee locations unless pressed.   Workplace Violence Prevention Policy Employers must adopt a written workplace violence prevention policy to be provided to employees upon hire and annually. The NY Department of Labor (NYDOL) will draft a model plan which will be evaluated every four years from 2027 onwards. Employers may adopt the NYDOL policy or create their own equivalent policy. The policy must: List factors or situations in the workplace which may increase the employees’ risk of workplace violence. Examples given include working late at night or early morning hours; exchanging money with the public; working alone or in small numbers; and uncontrolled access to the workplace. List methods of preventing workplace violence, including but not limited to establishing and implementing a reporting system. Provide information on federal and state laws regarding violence towards retail workers and remedies available for victims of workplace violence. Explicitly state that it is unlawful to retaliate against employees who report workplace violence or factors which place employees at risk of workplace violence. Workplace Violence Prevention Training Employers must provide training upon hire and annually. The NYDOL will provide interactive training which will also be evaluated every four years starting in 2027. Again, employers may opt to use the state provided training or provide their own equivalent. The training must: Include information on the Retail Worker Safety Act; Examples of steps employees can take to protect themselves; De-escalation strategies; Active Shooter drills; Emergency procedures; Instructions on how to use security alarms, panic buttons, and any other emergency devices; and A site-specific list of emergency exits and meeting places to be used in emergencies. Takeaways New York State retail employers should look at the state provided training and policies to adopt as their own or to ensure their own materials are compliant. For employers outside of New York it is important to keep your eyes peeled for creation of similar laws in your own state. Brody and Associates regularly advises management on complying with the latest local, state and federal employment laws.  If we can be of assistance in this area, please contact us at info@brodyandassociates.com or 203.454.0560      

Many consultants/advisors/coaches are serving business owners who resist the notion there might be significant, unrecognized issues in their company, or who believe they needn’t be concerned about issues they don’t know about.  Call it the Ostrich-Head-In-The-Sand Syndrome. As a consequence, consultants feel powerless to get their clients to take action in their own best interest.  From an exit planning perspective, being fully prepared for a future exit is one of those critical issues business owners may be inclined to ignore until it is too late. On Thursday, December 5th, join EvaluSys CEO Tom Bixby and XPX Charlotte founder in a discussion with Larry Gard, Ph.D., XPX Chicago member, executive coach, former longtime clinical psychologist who will help attendees get inside the head of business owners to: Feel confident in your ability to reach clients who resist identifying and confronting issues in their business. Generate client curiosity in your approach and interest in your recommendations. Have a significant impact on your clients’ success in ways they hadn’t anticipated. This program is scheduled for 45 minutes, to include significant opportunity for Q&A with Dr. Gard.  Don’t miss this important program helping you grow your power to create value for your advisory clients!

If you’re looking to attract an investor or an acquirer one day, expect them to dig into your sales and marketing process. If you’re a company that sells to other businesses, an investor will want to know where you get your leads from and how much each costs you to generate. They’ll want to know what technology you use to support your sales team. They’ll want to understand how your sales reps get meetings and how many appointments a good rep has each week. They’ll want to know the close rate of a high performer and how it compares to an average performer. The investor’s questions aim to gauge the scalability of your sales model under significantly higher investment rather than to assess your past performance. Acquirers love stumbling over a business where capital is the primary constraint to growth. They fall over themselves for a company with an efficient sales engine that needs more fuel (i.e., money). Most investors have lots of capital but struggle to find businesses with a sales system that won’t collapse under the weight of more money. How Gregg Romanzo Built a Sales System In 2004, Gregg Romanzo started an old-school freight brokering business. Most freight brokers are nothing more than a handful of people arranging shipments in return for razor-thin margins, but Romanzo realized his sales model had the potential to grow into something much bigger. Romanzo’s model involved hiring high-potential people with a relatively modest base salary of between $40,000 and $60,000 per year and teaching them the business from scratch. He armed them with a computer and access to the best scheduling software and tied their variable compensation to the gross margin of the jobs they booked. Romanzo knew if he could get a rep to clear $100,000 per year in total compensation, he could keep them for the long run. Romanzo took his very best talent—the top one or two percent—and built a team around them so they could earn even more. This cohort of salespeople could clear three, four, or even five hundred thousand dollars in an exceptional year. Since Romanzo paid a relatively low base salary and his people didn’t need much equipment, he could hire many salespeople. By the time he sold his company, he had 200 employees, 190 of whom were salespeople. That’s 95% of his headcount dedicated to sales. How does that compare to your company? If you have a winning formula you think would hold up if you doubled or quadrupled your sales team, consider monetizing the sales model you’ve created. Either hire more reps or show a deep-pocketed investor or acquirer how durable your sales model is and how all you need is their capital to grow it.

Previous
Next

Explore the Knowledge Exchange

Search